3.   CHAPTER: EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC SECTOR IN INDIA

 

3.1         Industrial Policy Resolution 1956

Text Box: "The State will progressively assume predominance and direct responsibility for setting up new industrial undertakings and for developing transport facilities."
-Industrial Policy Resolution 1956.

Before independence, there was almost no 'Public Sector' in the Indian economy. The only instances worthy of mention were the Railways, the Posts and Telegraphs, the Port Trust, the Ordnance and the Aircraft factories and few Government managed undertakings like the Government salt factories, quinine factories etc. After independence and with the advent of planning, India opted for the dominance of the public sector, firmly believing that political independence without economic self-reliance was not good for the country. The passage of Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 and adoption of the socialist pattern of society led to a deliberate enlargement of our public sector. It was believed that a dominant public sector would reduce the inequality of income and wealth, and advance the general prosperity of the nation. The planners also seemed to believe that by placing the management and workers in public enterprises in a position of responsibility and trust, they would be so imbued with a sense of the public good that their actions and aspirations would naturally reflect what was best for the country.

 

3.2         Main objectives for setting up the Public Sector Enterprises

The main objectives for setting up the Public Sector Enterprises as stated in the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 were:

·        To help in the rapid economic growth and industrialisation of the country and create the necessary infrastructure for economic development;

·        To earn return on investment and thus generate resources for development;

·        To promote redistribution of income and wealth;

·        To create employment opportunities;

·        To promote balanced regional development;

·        To assist in the development of small-scale and ancillary industries; and

·        To promote import substitutions, save and earn foreign exchange for the economy.

In tune with the widespread belief at that time, the 2nd Five Year Plan stated very clearly that 'the adoption of socialist pattern of society as the national objective, as well as the need for planned and rapid development, require that all industries of basic and strategic importance, or in the nature of public utility services, should be in the public sector. Other industries, which are essential and require investment on a scale, which only the state, in the present circumstances, could provide, have also to be in the public sector. The state has, therefore, to assume direct responsibility for the future development of industries over a wider area '.

The Second Plan further emphasized that ' the public sector has to expand rapidly. It has not only to initiate developments which the private sector is either unwilling or unable to undertake, it has to play the dominant role in shaping the entire pattern of investment in the economy, whether it makes the investments directly or whether these are made by the private sector. The private sector has to play its part within the framework of the comprehensive plan accepted by the community.'

3.1.3         Growth of Investment

 

The investment in public sector enterprises has thus grown enormously from Rs.29 crore as on 1.4.1951 to Rs.2,74,114 crore as on 31.3.2001. The growth of investment in the central public sector enterprises, including those enterprises that are under construction, over the years, is given below:

 Investment in Public Sector Enterprises

Particulars

Total Investment (Crore)

Enterprises (Numbers)

At the commencement of the 1st 5-Year Plan (1.4.1951)

29

5

At the commencement of the 2nd 5-Year Plan (1.4.1956)

81

21

At the commencement of the 3rd 5-Year Plan (1.4.1961)

948

47

At the end of the 3rd 5-Year Plan (31.3.1966)

2,410

73

At the commencement of the 4th 5-Year Plan (1.4.1969)

3,897

84

At the commencement of the 5th 5-Year Plan (1.4.1974)

6,237

122

At the end of 5th 5-Year Plan (31.3.1979)

15,534

169

At the commencement of the 6th 5-Year Plan (1.4.1980)

18,150

179

At the commencement of the 7th 5-Year Plan (1.4.1985)

42,673

215

At the end of 7th 5-Year Plan (31.3.1990)

99,329

244

At the commencement of the 8th 5-Year Plan (1.4.1992)

1,35,445

246

At the end of 8th 5-Year Plan (31.3.1997)

2,13,610

242

As on 31.3.1998

2,31,024

240

As on 31.3.1999

2,39,167

240

As on 31.3.2000

2,52,554

240

As on 31.03.2001

2,74,114

242

Source:  Public Enterprises Survey, 2000-2001

 

top